How We Hit 60% Gift-to-Meeting Conversion With Contact-Level Signals

Before joining Influ2 as VP of Sales Development, I worked at Sendoso, leading pipeline-driving and organic social gifting. At some point, I may or may not have picked up the nickname "Gifting Queen." 

Suffice to say: I know how gifting works.

What I didn't know was how much better it could work with contact-level intent signals in the mix.

We recently ran our first gifting campaign at Influ2, using engagement signals to inform our recipient list. The results were honestly a little wild: 60% of the people we sent a gift to booked a meeting. 

Let me repeat that: We had a 60% gift-to-meeting conversion rate.

Here’s a detailed breakdown of exactly what we did and why I believed it was so successful.

What actually makes a gifting campaign work

Sendoso’s research shows 84% of B2B buyers have grown tired of cold calls, and 82% feel overwhelmed by the volume of sales outreach emails they receive. But a no-strings-attached gift from a brand that's done its homework? That’s hard to ignore.

The key is "done its homework." A gifting campaign that reaches the wrong people at the wrong time doesn't just fall flat; it wastes budget and pulls sales reps toward contacts who want the prize, not you. 

I've seen the "$50 gift card if you take this call" playbook generate meetings. I've also seen how few of those meetings go anywhere.

To avoid that outcome, I'm pretty deliberate about what I send, who I send it to, and how it's executed.

A gift worth sending isn't simply “something people want.” The ideal gift is a tangible expression of your brand. The ones I've seen perform best share a few specific qualities:

• Cost-effective: Scalable without making your finance team nervous
• Desirable: Something recipients actually want, as opposed to another branded tumbler
• Relevant: Connected to your story in a way that feels intentional rather than generic

Cost-effective + Desirable + Relevant.

Influ2 is a contact-level ABM platform.  The foundation of everything we do is people. 

This people-centric approach extends to all aspects of our business, including gift-giving. Said another way, the “who” is equally as important as the “what.”

The way most teams build recipient lists (firmographic fit, job title, company size, and so on) is a reasonable baseline. It’s not bad. It’s not wrong. But it’s table stakes. 

The main issues? These data tell you nothing about actual intent. You're sending to people who might be interested, not people who demonstrably are. 

The solve is simple and direct: contact-level engagement data from Influ2 (more on that in a minute).

But of course, the actual execution makes a significant difference in running a successful campaign. 

The mechanics are fairly consistent across programs: send an invitation >> ship the gift >>deliver an experience worth remembering.

My approach: a single email or a short sequence, sent by an executive or a familiar face on the sales team. But let me be very clear: There is no single right approach, no silver bullet solution. The goal is simple: getting the offer to the right person without it feeling transactional.

The shipping is where a platform like Sendoso is extremely important. Physical gifting at any real scale involves a lot of moving parts (sourcing, inventory, packaging, fulfillment coordination). Trying to manage all of it in-house can be a nightmare.

The experience wrapper is the part that separates a campaign from a package. Box design, insert copy, the moment of unboxing — these details shape how a recipient feels about your brand before anyone on your team says a word to them.

Our Oura Ring x Influ2 campaign

Oura Ring is a smart ring that tracks biometric data (sleep, recovery, stress levels, and so on) and translates those signals into actionable health insights. The parallel to what Influ2 does for buyer behavior was too clean to pass up: we both take underlying signals and turn them into something you can act on. So naturally, we built the campaign narrative around that very connection.

For our recipient criteria, we started with the standard firmographic cut:

• Right segment: Mid-market and enterprise organizations
• Right fit: Companies with established ABM programs
• Right title: ABM marketing managers and adjacent roles

But that only got us so far.

The differentiating layer was contact-level ad engagement data from Influ2. Because Influ2 ties ad engagement to a specific named person, we could see which accounts were in-market, and which individuals had already demonstrated interest. That data informed who was on the list and whether the timing felt right for each person.

The net result: a premium gift sent to people we were confident about, rather than hoping for the best.

Using contact-level signals to curate an experience

Before I walk through the execution, two things are worth acknowledging.

1. Since we built our list from real engagement signals, we showed up without attached expectations. We had evidence of real interest, which changed the entire campaign posture.

2. We targeted ABM marketers specifically, as a well-run gifting campaign likely resonates well with that audience.

Here's how it ran.

First, SDRs sent an email with one simple premise: "We're betting an Oura Ring that we're right for you." 

IMPORTANT: We didn’t require a meeting to get the gift.

When someone opted in, we physically mailed a sizing kit and brochure with a QR code to claim their ring ... with a short stop along the way. 

The QR code led to a brief, self-guided product walkthrough. As prospects moved through it, they learned how biometric signals and buyer signals are related and what that means in practice. 

The walkthrough ended with an opportunity to request their ring and, if interested, book a conversation.

Not interested in talking? No problem. We still sent the OuraRing. No pressure. No obligation. Just an amazing, practic\al gift, a coherent story, and a well-placed bet that if we reached the right people, the meetings would follow without us having to require them.

Spoiler alert: They did.

The results exceeded blew away our (high) expectations

As a former Sendoso employee, I have a pretty calibrated sense of what strong performance looks like. So when I saw the results using contact-level signals from Influ2, I was blown away.

60% of gift recipients booked a meeting
84x the campaign's cost generated in pipeline

The conversion rate was impressive on its own, but so was the quality: only 2 closed lost out of everything the campaign generated so far. The signal-informed list gave us the right people, not just more volume.

What this ridiculous success tells me about gifting

Contact-level intent signals make gifting more effective. Full stop.

The Oura Ring campaign confirmed it — not just at the moment of send, but all the way through: the contact-level intent signals literally change how you design the campaign, how you write the invitation, how confident the team feels, and ultimately how often the right people show up ready to have a real conversation.

I've run a lot of these programs over the years, but few have performed like this.

The gift wasn't the unlock. The signal was. Once you know who's actually paying attention, everything downstream — the invitation, the timing, the confidence of the team sending it — gets sharper.

Turns out the Gifting Queen still had tricks up her sleeve: send the right thing to the right person at the right moment, and meetings stop being something you chase.

They just show up.

‍